BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. Bloom

68 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13248, 2011 WL 3677076
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 2011·No. 1D10-4774·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellees concede that the trial court erroneously calculated the offset due to the appellant by figuring 2% of the Construction Contract, when the correct offset was 2% of the loan amount. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to an offset in the amount of $17,175.00, as it claims. We remand to the trial court for entry of a revised final judgment reflecting the correct amount of offset. As to the other issues the appellant has raised, we affirm.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. Bloom, 68 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13248, 2011 WL 3677076 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

68 So. 3d 364 (BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. Bloom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allaben v. Keenan
68 So. 3d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)