Allaben v. Keenan

68 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13238, 2011 WL 3677075
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 2011·No. 1D10-5689·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred as a matter of law by dismissing appellant’s amended complaint, because the four corners of the complaint do not show that appellee’s allegedly defamatory statement about appellant to Ms. Allaben had some connection to matters that were the subject of Ms. Alla-ben’s dissolution proceeding.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allaben v. Keenan, 68 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13238, 2011 WL 3677075 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

68 So. 3d 364 (Allaben v. Keenan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. Bloom
68 So. 3d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)