Bramlette v. Paxton

228 So. 2d 167, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5887
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 30, 1969
DocketNo. 2818
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 So. 2d 167 (Bramlette v. Paxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bramlette v. Paxton, 228 So. 2d 167, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5887 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinions

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled “Audrey Paxton v. Hugh T. Bramlette”, 228 So.2d 161, in which a separate decision is rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present matter is affirmed insofar as it rejects the demands of Hugh T. Bramlette for restitution of his separate and paraphernal funds. All rights are reserved to both plaintiff and defendant to seek a partition and settlement of the community formerly existing between them. All costs in the lower court, as well as the cost of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff appellant.

Affirmed, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paxton v. Bramlette
228 So. 2d 161 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 So. 2d 167, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bramlette-v-paxton-lactapp-1969.