Bramlette v. Paxton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Bramlette v. Paxton

228 So. 2d 167, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5887

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 30, 1969·No. No. 2818·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled “Audrey Paxton v. Hugh T. Bramlette”, 228 So.2d 161, in which a separate decision is rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present matter is affirmed insofar as it rejects the demands of Hugh T. Bramlette for restitution of his separate and paraphernal funds. All rights are reserved to both plaintiff and defendant to seek a partition and settlement of the community formerly existing between them. All costs in the lower court, as well as the cost of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff appellant.

Affirmed, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled “Audrey Paxton v. Hugh T. Bramlette”, 228 So.2d 161, in which a separate decision is rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present matter is affirmed insofar as it rejects the demands of Hugh T. Bramlette for restitution of his separate and paraphernal funds. All rights are reserved to both plaintiff and defendant to seek a partition and settlement of the community formerly existing between them. All costs in the lower court, as well as the cost of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff appellant.

Affirmed, as amended.

Bramlette v. Paxton, 228 So. 2d 167, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5887 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

228 So. 2d 167 (Bramlette v. Paxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related