Brady v. Cortes

872 A.2d 170
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 21, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

872 A.2d 170 (2005)

Robert J. BRADY, Individually and on Behalf of Democratic Executive Committee of Philadelphia and Vito F. Canuso, Individually and on Behalf of Republican City Committee, Appellees
v.
Pedro A. CORTES, Secretary of the Commonwealth and Harry A. Vansickle, Commissioner of Elections, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 21, 2005.

Howard Greeley Hopkirk, John G. Knorr, Susan Jane Forney, Calvin Royer Koons, Harrisburg, for Pedro A. Cortes, Secty. of the Comm. and Harry A. Vansickle, Com'r of Elections, appellants.

Gregg R. Melinson, Philadelphia, for Robert J. Brady, appellee.

Steven S. Kaplin, for Democratic Executive Committee of Philadelphia, appellee.

Michael P. Meehan, Philadelphia, for Vito F. Canuso, Jr., appellee.

Louis Lawrence Boyle, for Bureau of Elections.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2005, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Chief Justice CAPPY and Justice EAKIN dissent on the basis of Jackson v. Davis, 507 Pa. 626, 493 A.2d 687 (1985).

Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady v. Cortes, 872 A.2d 170 (Pa. 2005).

872 A.2d 170 (Brady v. Cortes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chesnov v. Cortes
927 A.2d 666 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)