Bradt v. Bradt
143 A.D. 863, 128 N.Y.S. 1114, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
The evidence does not show a completed gift. (Sullivan v. Sullivan, 161 N. Y. 554; Turnbull v. Turnbull, 118 App. Div. 449; Kelly v. Beers, 194 N. Y. 49.)
All concurred, except Houghton, J., dissenting, in opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradt v. Bradt, 143 A.D. 863, 128 N.Y.S. 1114, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
143 A.D. 863 (Bradt v. Bradt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradt v. Bradt
130 N.Y.S. 1106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)