Bradley v. United States

404 U.S. 567, 92 S. Ct. 746, 30 L. Ed. 2d 722, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 3831
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 24, 1972·No. 71-5431·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa with directions to dismiss the indictment. Durham v. United States, 401 U. S. 481 (1971).

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Blackmun dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Blackmun’s dissenting opinion in Durham v. United States, 401 U. S. 481, 483-485 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley v. United States, 404 U.S. 567, 92 S. Ct. 746, 30 L. Ed. 2d 722, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 3831 (1972).

404 U.S. 567 (Bradley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. David Ray, A/K/A David Young
21 F.3d 1134 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Bulls
925 F.2d 1127 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Pedro v. Spedalieri
910 F.2d 707 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. W.T.T. (A Juvenile)
800 F.2d 780 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Potts
548 F. Supp. 1239 (N.D. California, 1982)
Evenstad v. United States
494 F. Supp. 146 (D. Minnesota, 1980)
United States v. James Cobb
558 F.2d 486 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. William Thomas
521 F.2d 76 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Donald Ratliff Cady
495 F.2d 742 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Lee v. United States
414 U.S. 807 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Ray Allen Tollett v. United States
485 F.2d 1087 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
James Leroy Iverson v. State of North Dakota
480 F.2d 414 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
Arland L. Gerberding v. United States
471 F.2d 55 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)