Bradley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bradley v. State

136 S.W. 446, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 611

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 1911·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

HARPER, J.

The appellant was tried in the county court of Scurry county, charged with the offense of theft of property under $50 in value.

[1] The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the recognizance, in that the recognizance does not show that defendant has been convicted of any offense, or that any punishment has been assessed against him. The recognizance not being in the form required by law, and not containing in substance the necessary allegations, the motion is sustained, and this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

The appellant was tried in the county court of Scurry county, charged with the offense of theft of property under $50 in value.

[1] The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the recognizance, in that the recognizance does not show that defendant has been convicted of any offense, or that any punishment has been assessed against him. The recognizance not being in the form required by law, and not containing in substance the necessary allegations, the motion is sustained, and this cause is dismissed.

Bradley v. State, 136 S.W. 446, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 611 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

136 S.W. 446 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related