Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Bradley v. State

Bradley v. State

136 S.W. 446, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 611
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 136 S.W. 446 (Bradley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. State, 136 S.W. 446, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 611 (Tex. 1911).

Opinions

HARPER, J.

The appellant was tried in the county court of Scurry county, charged with the offense of theft of property under $50 in value.

[1] The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the recognizance, in that the recognizance does not show that defendant has been convicted of any offense, or that any punishment has been assessed against him. The recognizance not being in the form required by law, and not containing in substance the necessary allegations, the motion is sustained, and this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrett v. State
22 S.W.2d 930 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Pickerell v. State
198 S.W. 303 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Baumgarner v. State
142 S.W. 4 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Bumgarner v. State
142 S.W. 4 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Hickman v. State
141 S.W. 973 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Moreno v. State
143 S.W. 150 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.W. 446, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.