Barrett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Barrett v. State

13 S.W.2d 1114

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 23, 1929

DocketNo. 12228

StatusPublished

This text of 13 S.W.2d 1114 (Barrett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrett v. State, 13 S.W.2d 1114 (Tex. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one nor more than two years.

There are no complaints, by way of bills of exceptions or otherwise, of the rulings of the court, save the refusal to grant a new trial. There was no testimony introduced by the appellant. The state’s testimony is un-controverted, and fully supports the verdict of the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one nor more than two years.

There are no complaints, by way of bills of exceptions or otherwise, of the rulings of the court, save the refusal to grant a new trial. There was no testimony introduced by the appellant. The state’s testimony is un-controverted, and fully supports the verdict of the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.W.2d 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.