Bradley v. State

48 S.E. 904, 121 Ga. 162, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 63
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

1. “Though the amendment to the motion for a new trial was ‘allowed,’ it does not appear that the trial judge approved or certified its grounds as true. The assignments of error therein can not be considered.” Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202.

2. ■ The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict; it has met with the approval of the trial judge; and as no error of law is made apparent, the judgment denying a hew trial is Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley v. State, 48 S.E. 904, 121 Ga. 162, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 63 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 904 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Price v. State
152 S.E. 572 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Pollard v. State
54 S.E. 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)