Bradley v. State
48 S.E. 904, 121 Ga. 162, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 63
Opinion
1. “Though the amendment to the motion for a new trial was ‘allowed,’ it does not appear that the trial judge approved or certified its grounds as true. The assignments of error therein can not be considered.” Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202.
2. ■ The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict; it has met with the approval of the trial judge; and as no error of law is made apparent, the judgment denying a hew trial is Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradley v. State, 48 S.E. 904, 121 Ga. 162, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 63 (Ga. 1904).
48 S.E. 904 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Price v. State
152 S.E. 572 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Pollard v. State
54 S.E. 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)