Bradley Joseph Pruitt v. the State of Texas
This text of Bradley Joseph Pruitt v. the State of Texas (Bradley Joseph Pruitt v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00151-CR __________________
BRADLEY JOSEPH PRUITT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 356th District Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25286 __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
A jury found Bradley Joseph Pruitt guilty of aggravated assault of a public
servant and assessed Pruitt’s punishment at ninety-nine years of imprisonment and
assessed a $10,000 fine. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02(a)(1), (b)(2)(B).
Bradley Joseph Pruitt’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s
professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.
1 Crim. App. 1978). On December 13, 2021, we notified Pruitt that he could file a pro
se response on or before February 22, 2022. Pruitt did not file a response.
Our review of the record reveals arguable grounds exist to support a merits-
based argument that the trial court erred by including an order of restitution in the
written judgment. See Burt v. State, 445 S.W.3d 752 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Having
found arguable error, we must remand the case to the trial court for appointment of
new counsel to brief this and any other issues counsel shall determine merit appellate
review. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
It is, therefore, ordered that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to
the trial court for appointment of new counsel for the appellant, Bradley Joseph
Pruitt. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the order appointing new counsel
shall be filed with the Court by April 18, 2022. The brief of the appellant shall be
due thirty days after the appeal is reinstated. The State’s brief shall be due thirty days
after the appellant’s brief is filed. We remove the case from the submitted docket.
The appeal will be re-submitted after the briefs on the merits have been filed.
ORDER ENTERED March 18, 2022.
PER CURIAM
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bradley Joseph Pruitt v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-joseph-pruitt-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.