Bradford v. State
139 So. 911, 25 Ala. App. 606
This text of 139 So. 911 (Bradford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bradford v. State, 139 So. 911, 25 Ala. App. 606 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of adultery, and appeals.
The evidence for the state tends to prove the crime charged. The question of guilt was for the jury, and we see no reason to disturb the verdict.
*607 There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 So. 911, 25 Ala. App. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-state-alactapp-1932.