Bradford v. State

139 So. 911, 25 Ala. App. 606
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 1932·No. 8 Div. 335.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of adultery, and appeals.

The evidence for the state tends to prove the crime charged. The question of guilt was for the jury, and we see no reason to disturb the verdict.

*607 There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. State, 139 So. 911, 25 Ala. App. 606 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

139 So. 911 (Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.