Bradford v. State

121 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 609
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 1929·No. 8 Div. 752.·Published

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

In the absence of defendant and his wife, a deputy sheriff and another went to the house where defendant lived, and in a barn located about 100 yards from the house, after diligent search, they claimed to have found a small catsup bottle full of whisky buried in the cotton seed, with some fruit jars and a still worm. When arrested and told that the bottle of whisky had been found, he said: “If you did, somebody else put it there.” There is absolutely no evidence tending to prove a guilty scienter in this ease, and the defendant should have been acquitted.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the judgment of conviction was error. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. State, 121 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 609 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

121 So. 919 (Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.