Bradford v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

65 S.E. 127, 132 Ga. 851, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 425
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 28, 1909·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where a suit was brought in a' State court for a personal injury, and removed to the circuit court of the United States, and there dismissed by the ’ plaintiff before trial, without prejudice to the right to sue again, he could bring a second suit in the State court, for the same cause of action, laying damages at a sum less than that which would authorize a removal; and the former suit would furnish no ground for a plea in abatement. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Newman, 132 Ga. 523 (64 S. E. 541); McIver v. Florida Central & Peninsular R. Co., 110 Ga. 223 (36 S. E. 775, 65 L. R. A. 437).

2. If the full amount of costs which had accrued in the State court before the removal of the first case to the Federal court hád not been paid in connection with such removal, this would not be good ground for a plea in abatement to the second suit in the State court.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Action for damages. Before T. W. Skelly, judge pro hac vice. Gordon superior court. August 25, 1908. J. M. Lang and Seaborn & Barry Wright, for plaintiff. D. W. Blair and O. N. Starr, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 65 S.E. 127, 132 Ga. 851, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 425 (Ga. 1909).

65 S.E. 127 (Bradford v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powell v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
173 S.E. 196 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Martin v. Richmond Cotton Oil Co.
184 S.W. 127 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1916)