Bradbury v. Inhabitants of Falmouth

18 Me. 64
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedApril 15, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 Me. 64 (Bradbury v. Inhabitants of Falmouth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradbury v. Inhabitants of Falmouth, 18 Me. 64 (Me. 1841).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Weston C. J.

In certain cases, principally of a commercial character, what is, or is not, reasonable notice, has been held to be a question of law. This has been so established, from the convenience and necessity, in such cases, of a general rule. It may admit of serious doubt, whether notice to a town, of a defect in the highway, is not, in every case, a question of fact to a jury. But [66]*66here no actual notice, to any inhabitant of the town, was proved. It could be established only by implication, or inference, from other facts. In such a case, whatever may be said of others, we are well satisfied, that it belongs to the jury to determine, whether the town is chargeable with notice.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Katherine Stovall v. New England Telephone Company
2025 ME 47 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2025)
Security Pacific National Trust Co. v. Reid
615 A.2d 241 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Me. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradbury-v-inhabitants-of-falmouth-me-1841.