Bradbury v. Inhabitants of Falmouth

18 Me. 64
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided April 15, 1841·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Weston C. J.

In certain cases, principally of a commercial character, what is, or is not, reasonable notice, has been held to be a question of law. This has been so established, from the convenience and necessity, in such cases, of a general rule. It may admit of serious doubt, whether notice to a town, of a defect in the highway, is not, in every case, a question of fact to a jury. But [66] here no actual notice, to any inhabitant of the town, was proved. It could be established only by implication, or inference, from other facts. In such a case, whatever may be said of others, we are well satisfied, that it belongs to the jury to determine, whether the town is chargeable with notice.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradbury v. Inhabitants of Falmouth, 18 Me. 64 (Me. 1841).

18 Me. 64 (Bradbury v. Inhabitants of Falmouth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Katherine Stovall v. New England Telephone Company
2025 ME 47 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2025)
Security Pacific National Trust Co. v. Reid
615 A.2d 241 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1992)