Brad Meeks v. Southern Elegance Design & Landscape, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 22, 2017
DocketA18I0003
StatusPublished

This text of Brad Meeks v. Southern Elegance Design & Landscape, LLC (Brad Meeks v. Southern Elegance Design & Landscape, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brad Meeks v. Southern Elegance Design & Landscape, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 03, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18I0003. BRAD MEEKS v. SOUTHERN ELEGANCE DESIGN & LANDSCAPE, LLC.

In this civil action, third party defendant Brad Meeks seeks immediate review of the trial court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment. Meeks obtained a certificate of immediate review signed by a different judge than the judge who signed the denial order, and then he filed this application for interlocutory appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may apply for interlocutory appellate review “[w]here the trial judge in rendering an order, decision, or judgment, not otherwise subject to direct appeal, . . . certifies within ten days of entry thereof that the order, decision, or judgment is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had.” (Emphasis supplied.) In accordance with the plain language of the statute, “the same trial judge who entered the order in question must issue the certificate of immediate review.”1 Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC, 306 Ga. App. 160, 162 (701 SE2d 599) (2010). Because the certificate of immediate review submitted by Meeks is invalid, it does not confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Accordingly, this application for

1 This Court has recognized a limited exception to this rule where evidence shows that the trial judge was unavailable to execute the certificate. See Freemon v. Dubroca, 177 Ga. App. 745, 745 (1) (341 SE2d 276) (1986); Tingle v. Harvill, 125 Ga. App. 312, 317-318 (2) (187 SE2d 536) (1972); see also Thorpe v. Russell, 274 Ga. 781, 781-782 (559 SE2d 432) (2002). Meeks, however, has made no showing that the judge who issued the challenged order was unavailable. interlocutory appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/03/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freemon v. Dubroca
341 S.E.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Tingle v. Harvill
187 S.E.2d 536 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC
701 S.E.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Thorpe v. Russell
559 S.E.2d 432 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brad Meeks v. Southern Elegance Design & Landscape, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brad-meeks-v-southern-elegance-design-landscape-llc-gactapp-2017.