Braboy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Braboy v. State

868 So. 2d 663, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723, 2004 WL 576135

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 2004

DocketNo. 3D03-2160

StatusPublished

This text of 868 So. 2d 663 (Braboy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braboy v. State, 868 So. 2d 663, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723, 2004 WL 576135 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the absence of a showing in the record by the defense that there was a probability that the cocaine seized by the police was tampered with, we find no merit to the appellant’s chain of custody challenge. See Creme v. State, 752 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Garcia v. State, 721 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Dodd v. State, 537 So.2d 626, 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to sell or distribute.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the absence of a showing in the record by the defense that there was a probability that the cocaine seized by the police was tampered with, we find no merit to the appellant’s chain of custody challenge. See Creme v. State, 752 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Garcia v. State, 721 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Dodd v. State, 537 So.2d 626, 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to sell or distribute.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 So. 2d 663, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723, 2004 WL 576135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braboy-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack