Braboy v. State

868 So. 2d 663, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723, 2004 WL 576135
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2004·No. No. 3D03-2160·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the absence of a showing in the record by the defense that there was a probability that the cocaine seized by the police was tampered with, we find no merit to the appellant’s chain of custody challenge. See Creme v. State, 752 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Garcia v. State, 721 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Dodd v. State, 537 So.2d 626, 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to sell or distribute.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braboy v. State, 868 So. 2d 663, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723, 2004 WL 576135 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

868 So. 2d 663 (Braboy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dodd v. State
537 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Creme v. State
752 So. 2d 1238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Garcia v. State
721 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)