Brabazon v. Belships Co., Limited, Skibs, A/s

Third Circuit

Brabazon v. Belships Co., Limited, Skibs, A/s

198 F.2d 928

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 1952

Docket10822_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 F.2d 928 (Brabazon v. Belships Co., Limited, Skibs, A/s) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brabazon v. Belships Co., Limited, Skibs, A/s, 198 F.2d 928 (3d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

' PER CURIAM.

We will enter an order, albeit with some reluctance, granting the motion of the appellant, Belships Co., Ltd., Skibs, A/S, to state the contents of its appendix and to file its brief out of time. In its motion the appellant asserts reasons for its delay which we find none too convincing.

We accept the excuses offered on this occasion by the appellant but we point out that the injuries for which the appellee, a seaman, brought suit were suffered by him on December 29, 1949; nearly three years ago. We reiterate that seamen are wards of the admiralty and for this reason, if there was no other, counsel engaged in litigations in which seamen are concerned, must proceed promptly in preparing and prosecuting appeals to this court. We shall view unnecessary delays with little tolerance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

' PER CURIAM.

We will enter an order, albeit with some reluctance, granting the motion of the appellant, Belships Co., Ltd., Skibs, A/S, to state the contents of its appendix and to file its brief out of time. In its motion the appellant asserts reasons for its delay which we find none too convincing.

We accept the excuses offered on this occasion by the appellant but we point out that the injuries for which the appellee, a seaman, brought suit were suffered by him on December 29, 1949; nearly three years ago. We reiterate that seamen are wards of the admiralty and for this reason, if there was no other, counsel engaged in litigations in which seamen are concerned, must proceed promptly in preparing and prosecuting appeals to this court. We shall view unnecessary delays with little tolerance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 F.2d 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brabazon-v-belships-co-limited-skibs-as-ca3-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack