Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission

Third Circuit

Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission

200 F.2d 336

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 22, 1952·No. 10758_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CÚRIAM.

A careful examination of the briefs and the record in this appeal and consideration of the oral arguments of counsel have convinced us that the court below committed np 'error in its decision. We can add nothing to the careful analyses contained in the findings of fact, in the conclusions of law, and in the opinion of Judge Kalodner. See 100 F.Supp. 954. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CÚRIAM.

A careful examination of the briefs and the record in this appeal and consideration of the oral arguments of counsel have convinced us that the court below committed np 'error in its decision. We can add nothing to the careful analyses contained in the findings of fact, in the conclusions of law, and in the opinion of Judge Kalodner. See 100 F.Supp. 954. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission, 200 F.2d 336 (3d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

200 F.2d 336 (Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related