Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bozeman v. State

Bozeman v. State

994 So. 2d 1251, 2008 WL 4998803
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bozeman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 So. 2d 1006 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 2008·No. 4D08-1793·Published

Opinion

994 So.2d 1251 (2008)

Oliver BOZEMAN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 4D08-1793.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 26, 2008.

*1252 Oliver Bozeman, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied. The jury issue raised in the petition was not properly preserved for appeal. See Pinder v. State, 738 So.2d 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Therefore, appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise an unpreserved issue.

WARNER, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bozeman v. State, 994 So. 2d 1251, 2008 WL 4998803 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

994 So. 2d 1251 (Bozeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinder v. State
738 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)