Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bozeman v. State

Bozeman v. State

985 So. 2d 635, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1609
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2008
Docket4D08-740
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 985 So. 2d 635 (Bozeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bozeman v. State, 985 So. 2d 635, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1609 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

985 So.2d 635 (2008)

Reginald BOZEMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D08-740.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 18, 2008.
Rehearing Denied July 30, 2008.

*636 Reginald Bozeman, Jasper, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to the appellant filing an amended motion in the trial court within thirty days to include the claim he makes on appeal that this information was actually nolle prossed and that no other information was filed.

Affirmed.

SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silverstein v. State
985 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
985 So. 2d 635, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bozeman-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.