Boyle v. Hitchcock

California Supreme Court

Boyle v. Hitchcock

4 P. 1143, 66 Cal. 129, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 710

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 24, 1884

DocketNo. 7,982

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 4 P. 1143 (Boyle v. Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyle v. Hitchcock, 4 P. 1143, 66 Cal. 129, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 710 (Cal. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

-We are of opinion that the objection to the assessment, in this case, that it included an amount, as incidental expenses, for engineering and printing, was waived by a failure to appeal to the board of supervisors. (§ 12 of the act of 1872; Stats. 1871-2, p. 815.)

We are also of the opinion that the resolution of intention sufficiently described the work which the board of supervisors desired to have done.

Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

-We are of opinion that the objection to the assessment, in this case, that it included an amount, as incidental expenses, for engineering and printing, was waived by a failure to appeal to the board of supervisors. (§ 12 of the act of 1872; Stats. 1871-2, p. 815.)

We are also of the opinion that the resolution of intention sufficiently described the work which the board of supervisors desired to have done.

Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 P. 1143, 66 Cal. 129, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyle-v-hitchcock-cal-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack