Boykin v. State

744 So. 2d 1205, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14832, 1999 WL 1014944
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boykin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 725 So. 2d 1203
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 1999·No. No. 99-1336·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the time appellant was sentenced, the trial court was unaware of the supreme court’s recently released opinion holding that additional points for possession of a [1206]*1206firearm should not be assessed on a guidelines scoresheet when the defendant is convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. See Scott v. State, 717 So.2d 521 (Fla.1998); King v. State, 715 So.2d 256 (Fla.1998). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in this case after appellant’s guidelines scoresheet has been corrected by the deletion of the erroneous 18 points.

BOOTH, MINER and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boykin v. State, 744 So. 2d 1205, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14832, 1999 WL 1014944 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

744 So. 2d 1205 (Boykin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
715 So. 2d 256 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Scott v. State
717 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)