Boyer v. State
This text of 70 S.W.3d 551 (Boyer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Frederick Boyer appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum of law, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 S.W.3d 551, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 98, 2002 WL 80891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyer-v-state-moctapp-2002.