Boyer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Boyer v. State

14 S.W.3d 664, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2000 WL 291145

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 21, 2000·No. No. ED 76628·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Eric Boyer appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Eric Boyer appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Boyer v. State, 14 S.W.3d 664, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2000 WL 291145 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

14 S.W.3d 664 (Boyer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.