Boyer v. Boyer

261 A.D.2d 968, 689 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5110
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 7, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 968 (Boyer v. Boyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyer v. Boyer, 261 A.D.2d 968, 689 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum:. Family Court properly calculated respondent’s child support obligation in accordance with the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA). We reject respondent’s contention that the court lacked authority to increase the amount of child support awarded by the Hearing Examiner absent objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order or a rebuttal to respondent’s objections filed by petitioner. Upon his review of respondent’s objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order, the Family Court Judge was empowered to “make, with or without holding a new hearing, his * * * own findings of fact and order” (Family Ct Act § 439 [e] [ii]; see, Matter of Hughes v Wasik, 224 AD2d 982; Matter of Lucille Ann D. v David F. K., 219 AD2d 874, 875). The court properly concluded that the Hearing Examiner erred in adjusting respondent’s child support obligation based upon the number of meals the child ate with each party, and that the extent of respondent’s visitation with the child did not warrant a reduction in [969]*969respondent’s pro rata share of the basic child support obligation under the CSS A formula (see, Matter of Knapp v Levy, 245 AD2d 1027, 1027-1028, lv denied 91 NY2d 813; see also, Bast v Rossoff, 91 NY2d 723, 728-729). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Paris, J. — Support.) Present— Green, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JEFFERY, ELIZABETH v. SPRAGUE, GEOFFREY R.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Jeffery v. Sprague
103 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Sannuto v. Sannuto
21 A.D.3d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Eberhard v. Brechue
269 A.D.2d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Wallace v. Whitsell
183 Misc. 2d 177 (NYC Family Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D.2d 968, 689 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyer-v-boyer-nyappdiv-1999.