Boyer, Inc. v. Trinity River Authority of Texas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boyer, Inc. v. Trinity River Authority of Texas. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 S.W.3d 354
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 2012·No. 02-11-00459-CV·Published

Opinion

02-10-131-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00459-CV

Boyer, Inc.

APPELLANT

V.

Trinity River Authority of Texas

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 352nd District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant “Boyer, Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

          Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  February 2, 2012



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyer, Inc. v. Trinity River Authority of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Boyer, Inc. v. Trinity River Authority of Texas (Boyer, Inc. v. Trinity River Authority of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.