Boyd v. State

687 So. 2d 1389, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1700, 1997 WL 80091
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1997·No. No. 95-3337·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The state showed by a preponderance' of the evidence that the out-of-state conviction it relied on for the prior felony for habitual violent felony offender status was a conviction of appellant’s. See § 775.084(l)(b), (3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993). With respect to the seoresheet error, the state concedes that the trial court erroneously added points for the victim’s death, an offense for which appellant was not found guilty. See Harris v. State, 658 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). However, we agree with the state that the error was harmless given the trial court’s imposition of the maximum sentence allowable for a habitual violent offender. See Sellers v. State, 578 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA), approved on other grounds, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991).

However, we remand for the trial court to correct the clerical error in the final judgment to show that appellant was convicted of attempted second degree murder in violation of section 782.04(2).

WARNER, STEVENSON and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. State, 687 So. 2d 1389, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1700, 1997 WL 80091 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

687 So. 2d 1389 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kenon v. State
780 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)