State v. Sellers
This text of 586 So. 2d 340 (State v. Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Louie Anthony SELLERS, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Sellers v. State, 578 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified direct conflict with Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), and Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
We recently held in Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991), that legal constraint points are to be assessed once in calculating sentencing scoresheets for offenses committed while on legal constraint. Accordingly, we approve of the decision below.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
586 So. 2d 340, 1991 WL 201587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sellers-fla-1991.