Boyd v. Farrin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boyd v. Farrin. Read the opinion of the Court — 958 F. Supp. 2d 232
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 6, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2012-1893·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JOHN W. BOYD, JR. and NATIONAL ) BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 12-01893 (RJL) ) JAMES SCOTT F ARRIN and ANDREW H. ) MARKS, ) ) Defendants. ~\ ) ORDER August ___2,_, 2013 [## 10, 13]

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant James Scott Farrin's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 10] is

GRANTED; it is further

ORDERED that Defendant Andrew H. Marks' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 13] is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed.

SO ORDERED. ()\ l ~u..(;J~) RICHARD J. Tho~ - United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. Farrin, (D.D.C. 2013).

Boyd v. Farrin (Boyd v. Farrin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.