Boyan v. General Time Instruments Corp.

267 A.D. 908, 47 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5456
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion under rules 112 and 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for a judgment dismissing the cause of action of the respondent. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. This respondent has no present interest in the cause of action. It was wholly assigned by operation of law to the insurance carrier, who is also a plaintiff in the consolidated action. (Wilton v. Radish, 266 App. Div. 974; Calagna v. Sheppard-Pollak, Ino., 264 App. Div. 589; Garter v. Brooklyn Ladder Go., Inc., 265 App. Div. 39.) The order of consolidation did not bar the defendant from moving. The questions here presented were not necessarily passed on in the motion for consolidation. Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aid-rich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyan v. General Time Instruments Corp., 267 A.D. 908, 47 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 908 (Boyan v. General Time Instruments Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Husted v. Hendrikson Bros.
283 A.D. 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)