Bowery Boy Realty, Inc. v. H.S.N. Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bowery Boy Realty, Inc. v. H.S.N. Realty Corp.

55 A.D.3d 769, 865 N.Y.S.2d 562

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.3d 769 (Bowery Boy Realty, Inc. v. H.S.N. Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowery Boy Realty, Inc. v. H.S.N. Realty Corp., 55 A.D.3d 769, 865 N.Y.S.2d 562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 1, 2008, as denied that branch of its motion pursuant to CPLR 6513 which was to extend the notice of pendency filed against the subject premises for a period commencing July 23, 2008 and ending three years from its original date of expiration.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In the companion case decided herewith, we directed cancellation of the subject notice of pendency (see Bowery Boy Realty, Inc. v H.S.N. Realty Corp., 55 AD3d 766 [2008] [decided herewith]). Accordingly, the plaintiffs contentions herein have been rendered academic and the appeal must be dismissed. Rivera, J.E, Spolzino, Florio and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 1, 2008, as denied that branch of its motion pursuant to CPLR 6513 which was to extend the notice of pendency filed against the subject premises for a period commencing July 23, 2008 and ending three years from its original date of expiration.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In the companion case decided herewith, we directed cancellation of the subject notice of pendency (see Bowery Boy Realty, Inc. v H.S.N. Realty Corp., 55 AD3d 766 [2008] [decided herewith]). Accordingly, the plaintiffs contentions herein have been rendered academic and the appeal must be dismissed. Rivera, J.E, Spolzino, Florio and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.3d 769, 865 N.Y.S.2d 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowery-boy-realty-inc-v-hsn-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack