Bowen v. Department of the Navy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bowen v. Department of the Navy. Read the opinion of the Court — 402 F. App'x 521
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 8, 2010·No. 2010-3065·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

RICHARD T. BOWEN, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent. ____________________

2010-3065 ______________________

Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF0752090040-I-2. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ALI M. SACHANI, Attorney at Law, Chatsworth, California, argued for petitioner.

ALLISON KIDD-MILLER, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was BRENDA VOSGUANIAN, United States Department of the Navy, of Port Hueneme, California. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 8, 2010 _/s/ Jan Horbaly______________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowen v. Department of the Navy, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Bowen v. Department of the Navy (Bowen v. Department of the Navy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.