Bowen v. Department of the Navy
This text of Bowen v. Department of the Navy (Bowen v. Department of the Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RICHARD T. BOWEN, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent. ____________________
2010-3065 ______________________
Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF0752090040-I-2. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ALI M. SACHANI, Attorney at Law, Chatsworth, California, argued for petitioner.
ALLISON KIDD-MILLER, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was BRENDA VOSGUANIAN, United States Department of the Navy, of Port Hueneme, California. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 8, 2010 _/s/ Jan Horbaly______________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bowen v. Department of the Navy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-department-of-the-navy-cafc-2010.