Bowen v. Ariail

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 1, 2010·No. 10-6919·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6919

TRAVIS LEE BOWEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT ARIAIL, 13th Circuit Solicitor; STEVE LOFTIS, Greenville County Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:10-cv-01249-CMC)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 1, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Lee Bowen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Travis Lee Bowen appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Bowen v. Ariail, No. 8:10-cv-01249-CMC

(D.S.C. June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowen v. Ariail, (4th Cir. 2010).

Bowen v. Ariail (Bowen v. Ariail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related