Bowen v. Ariail
This text of Bowen v. Ariail (Bowen v. Ariail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6919
TRAVIS LEE BOWEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT ARIAIL, 13th Circuit Solicitor; STEVE LOFTIS, Greenville County Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:10-cv-01249-CMC)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 1, 2010
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Lee Bowen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Travis Lee Bowen appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bowen v. Ariail, No. 8:10-cv-01249-CMC
(D.S.C. June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bowen v. Ariail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-ariail-ca4-2010.