Bowen v. Ariail

Fourth Circuit

Bowen v. Ariail

403 F. App'x 790

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 1, 2010·No. No. 10-6919·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Travis Lee Bowen appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowen v. Ariail, No. 8:10-cv-01249-CMC, 2010 WL 2430921 (D.S.C. June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Travis Lee Bowen appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowen v. Ariail, No. 8:10-cv-01249-CMC, 2010 WL 2430921 (D.S.C. June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bowen v. Ariail, 403 F. App'x 790 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

403 F. App'x 790 (Bowen v. Ariail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related