Bowden v. Bowden

990 So. 2d 397, 2007 WL 3407776
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 16, 2007·No. 2060440·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R.App. P.; Rule 28(a)(10), Ala. R.App. P.; FabArc Steel Supply, Inc. v.Composite Constr. Sys., Inc., 914 So.2d 344, 354 (Ala. 2005); Ex parte Elliott, 782 So.2d 308, 311 (Ala. 2000); TenEyck v. TenEyck, 885 So.2d 146, 159 (Ala.Civ.App. 2003); Britt v. Britt, 684 So.2d 1325,1326 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996); Golden v. Golden,681 So.2d 605, 608 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996); Carter v. Carter,666 So.2d 28, 29 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995); Scholl v. Parsons,655 So.2d 1060, 1062 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995); and Silvey v.Silvey, 634 So.2d 138, 140 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993).

BRYAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

THOMPSON, P.J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with writing, which MOORE, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowden v. Bowden, 990 So. 2d 397, 2007 WL 3407776 (Ala. Ct. App. 2007).

990 So. 2d 397 (Bowden v. Bowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowden v. Bowden
990 So. 2d 397 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)