Bovin Okoth Marco v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.
This text of Bovin Okoth Marco v. Christopher Chestnut, et al. (Bovin Okoth Marco v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOVIN OKOTH MARCO, Case No. 25-cv-10766-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 v. 10 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., ll Defendants. 12
13 This is a habeas case brought by an immigration detainee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 14 || Petitioner Bovin Okoth Marco challenges his detention by the United States Immigration and 3 15 |} Customs Enforcement at the California City Detention Facility in Kern County, California, which a 16 || is located in the Eastern District of California. Dkt. No. 1 § 12. The petition was filed while he 3 17 || was detained at that location. Id. Consequently, the case is transferred to the Eastern District of 18 California, as that is the district of detention. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1406(a), 2241(a); Doe v. Garland, 19 109 F.4th 1188, 1197-98 (9th Cir. 2024). 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: December 18, 2025 22 23 JAMES PONATO- United Ptates District Judge 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bovin Okoth Marco v. Christopher Chestnut, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bovin-okoth-marco-v-christopher-chestnut-et-al-caed-2025.