Bovin Okoth Marco v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOVIN OKOTH MARCO, Case No. 25-cv-10766-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 v. 10 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., ll Defendants. 12

13 This is a habeas case brought by an immigration detainee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 14 || Petitioner Bovin Okoth Marco challenges his detention by the United States Immigration and 3 15 |} Customs Enforcement at the California City Detention Facility in Kern County, California, which a 16 || is located in the Eastern District of California. Dkt. No. 1 § 12. The petition was filed while he 3 17 || was detained at that location. Id. Consequently, the case is transferred to the Eastern District of 18 California, as that is the district of detention. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1406(a), 2241(a); Doe v. Garland, 19 109 F.4th 1188, 1197-98 (9th Cir. 2024). 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: December 18, 2025 22 23 JAMES PONATO- United Ptates District Judge 25 26 27 28