Boutique Industries, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights
228 A.D.2d 171, 643 N.Y.2d 986, 643 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6283
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Substantial evidence supports the finding of discrimination. However, the award of compensatory damages is excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boutique Industries, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 228 A.D.2d 171, 643 N.Y.2d 986, 643 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 171 (Boutique Industries, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lore v. City of Syracuse
670 F.3d 127 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Taylor v. New York University Medical Center
21 Misc. 3d 23 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
381 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2004)
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
185 F. Supp. 2d 193 (N.D. New York, 2002)
Epstein v. Kalvin-Miller International, Inc.
139 F. Supp. 2d 469 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Ortiz-Del Valle v. National Basketball Ass'n
42 F. Supp. 2d 334 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Courtney v. City of New York
20 F. Supp. 2d 655 (S.D. New York, 1998)
McIntyre v. Manhattan Ford
176 Misc. 2d 325 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Allender v. Mercado
233 A.D.2d 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)