Bouteiller v. Nevada Attorney General
This text of 302 F. App'x 701 (Bouteiller v. Nevada Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Paul Alfred Bouteiller appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust his claims in state court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.
To the extent Bouteiller raises uncertified issues in his briefs, we construe those contentions as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability and we deny the motion. See 9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).
The district court properly dismissed without prejudice the federal claims alleged in grounds one and two of the petition.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 F. App'x 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouteiller-v-nevada-attorney-general-ca9-2008.