Botero v. State

742 So. 2d 814, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10687, 1999 WL 599232
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Botero v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10495
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 1999·No. No. 99-01996·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sergio Alonso Botero appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

Botero was found guilty of cocaine trafficking, and his conviction was affirmed by this court in an opinion issued on October 9, 1996. See Botero v. State, 681 So.2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Botero then sought certiorari review in the supreme court, which was denied on March 18, 1997. Botero v. State, 691 So.2d 1079 (Fla.1997). Botero’s conviction was not final until his petition for certiorari was denied by the supreme court. See Beaty v. State, 684 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (stating that when the appellate court has written an opinion and the appellant has sought supreme court review of the opinion, the two-year time period begins to run on a rule 3.850 motion when the supreme court has disposed of the writ). Consequently, the trial court’s conclusion that the motion was untimely was erroneous. However, we have reviewed Botero’s motion, and find the substantive issues he raised to be without merit and, therefore, affirm the denial.

Affirmed.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Botero v. State, 742 So. 2d 814, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10687, 1999 WL 599232 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

742 So. 2d 814 (Botero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Botero v. State
681 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Beaty v. State
684 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)