Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Botero v. State

Botero v. State

725 So. 2d 415, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 157, 1999 WL 10394
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Botero v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10495 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 13, 1999·No. No. 98-03844·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice for Sergio Botero to file in the trial court a properly sworn motion for postconviction relief and, if desired, a properly sworn memorandum in support of the motion. Filing must be accomplished within ninety days of the date of this opinion to be considered timely.

BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Botero v. State, 725 So. 2d 415, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 157, 1999 WL 10394 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

725 So. 2d 415 (Botero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.