Boswell v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

410 S.E.2d 829, 201 Ga. App. 177, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1254
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boswell v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 Ga. App. 902
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 12, 1991·No. A90A0849·Published

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

In Boswell v. MARTA, 196 Ga. App. 902 (397 SE2d 165) (1990), we held that appellee-defendant Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) was not immune from liability for punitive damages because the legislation whereby MARTA had been created contained “ ‘a clear, complete and absolute waiver of [any] governmental immunity from tort liability.’ ” On certiorari, however, the Supreme Court reversed, concluding that, “as a matter of law, an award of punitive damages against MARTA would violate public policy. . . .” Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth. v. Boswell, 261 Ga. 427 (405 SE2d 869) (1991). Accordingly, our original judgment is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court and the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boswell v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 410 S.E.2d 829, 201 Ga. App. 177, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1254 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

410 S.E.2d 829 (Boswell v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Boswell
405 S.E.2d 869 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)