Boston & Maine Railroad v. Construction MacHinery Corp.

194 N.E.2d 395, 346 Mass. 513, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 641
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 194 N.E.2d 395 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. Construction MacHinery Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Construction MacHinery Corp., 194 N.E.2d 395, 346 Mass. 513, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 641 (Mass. 1963).

Opinion

Cutter, J.

The railroad seeks by this bill in equity to obtain specific enforcement of certain undertakings 1 of its grantee (to remove snow and ice from the railroad’s ramps and platforms and to light them). These undertakings were set out in a deed, dated December 28, 1960, to Construction Machinery Corporation (Construction), by which the railroad conveyed to Construction land (parcel 1), in- *515 eluding the Winchester railroad station, on the west side of the railroad. The undertakings were expressed as covenants and, for convenience, are referred to as “the covenants.” Parcel 1 did not include the railroad’s land on which stand the northbound and southbound railroad tracks and platforms, all of which were at the level of the second story of the railroad station, and the ramps leading thereto from the street level. Construction conveyed parcel 1 to DeVries Supply Company, Inc. (DeVries), by a deed which provided that DeVries, “by the acceptance hereof, hereby assumes and agrees to perform each of the covenants, agreements, and obligations set forth in” the deed of December 28,1960, “which are applicable to [p]arcel 1.”

The accompanying sketch plan shows parcel 1 and the immediately adjacent railroad land, tracks, platforms, and ramps. Additional platform space and other ramps lie on railroad land to the north of those shown on the plan.

Construction and DeVries were joined as defendants. The case was in effect heard upon a statement of agreed facts, which set out, or showed by attached plans, the facts already stated, so far as not established by the pleadings. The trial judge took a view.

DeVries is willing to remove snow and ice from its own property but is not willing to remove snow and ice from the ramps, platforms, and access ways on the railroad property. DeVries contends that it is not bound to light the platforms and ramps on the railroad property. 2

*516

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawrence v. Lachowitz
Massachusetts Land Court, 2021
Well-Built Homes, Inc. v. Shuster
834 N.E.2d 1213 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2005)
In Re Fleishman
138 B.R. 641 (D. Massachusetts, 1992)
Choate, Hall & Stewart v. SCA Services, Inc.
392 N.E.2d 1045 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1979)
Falmouth Hospital v. Lopes
382 N.E.2d 1042 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Day v. McEwen
385 A.2d 790 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)
Liberty Bank & Trust Co. v. Lipshutz
363 N.E.2d 289 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)
Guillette v. Daly Dry Wall, Inc.
325 N.E.2d 572 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
Merrill v. Kirkland Construction Co., Inc.
310 N.E.2d 106 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1974)
Bettencourt v. Bettencourt
284 N.E.2d 238 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
Essex Co. v. Goldman
258 N.E.2d 526 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)
Shell Oil Co. v. Henry Ouellette & Sons Co. Inc.
227 N.E.2d 509 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.E.2d 395, 346 Mass. 513, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-maine-railroad-v-construction-machinery-corp-mass-1963.