Bossier Chrysler-Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg
This text of 238 S.W.3d 376 (Bossier Chrysler-Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal we are asked to consider whether the case should be remanded for a new trial on attorney’s fees. A divided court of appeals affirmed the attorney’s fees award although it reduced the trial court’s damage award by eighty-seven percent. 201 S.W.3d 787. We have said that the issue of attorney’s fees should ordinarily be retried under these circumstances unless the appellate court is “reasonably certain that the jury was not significantly influenced by the erroneous [damage award].” Barker v. Eckman, 213 S.W.3d 306 (Tex.2006). Our opinion in Barker issued after the court of appeals’ opinion in this case, and thus the court of appeals did not have the benefit of that decision. Accordingly, without hearing oral argument pursuant to Rule 59.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the petition for review and reverse that part of the court of appeals’ judgment regarding attorney’s fees, and remand the case to the court of appeals for its consideration of the attorney’s fees issue in light of Barker.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 S.W.3d 376, 51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 106, 2007 Tex. LEXIS 975, 2007 WL 3230316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bossier-chrysler-dodge-ii-inc-v-rauschenberg-tex-2007.