Bosch v. State
560 So. 2d 256, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1990 WL 29501
Opinion
Defendant Bosch appeals his convictions of trafficking in cocaine and unlawful possession of a firearm, contending that some of the evidence used against him was the product of an invalid consent search. We conclude that there was ample evidence to support the trial court’s findings that the consent was voluntary. See Denehy v. State, 400 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla.1980); Perez v. State., 536 So.2d 359, 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). See generally 3 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.2(c), at 188-89 (2d ed. 1987).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bosch v. State, 560 So. 2d 256, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1990 WL 29501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
560 So. 2d 256 (Bosch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Denehy v. State
400 So. 2d 1216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Perez v. State
536 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)