Bosch v. State

560 So. 2d 256, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1990 WL 29501
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 20, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1868
StatusPublished

This text of 560 So. 2d 256 (Bosch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bosch v. State, 560 So. 2d 256, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1990 WL 29501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Bosch appeals his convictions of trafficking in cocaine and unlawful possession of a firearm, contending that some of the evidence used against him was the product of an invalid consent search. We conclude that there was ample evidence to support the trial court’s findings that the consent was voluntary. See Denehy v. State, 400 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla.1980); Perez v. State., 536 So.2d 359, 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). See generally 3 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.2(c), at 188-89 (2d ed. 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Denehy v. State
400 So. 2d 1216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Perez v. State
536 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 So. 2d 256, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1990 WL 29501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bosch-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.