Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co.

225 N.W. 1, 246 Mich. 578, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 936

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 17, 1929

DocketDocket No. 12, Calendar No. 34,056.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 225 N.W. 1 (Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co., 225 N.W. 1, 246 Mich. 578, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 936 (Mich. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant sold plaintiff an automobile on time without delivering to him a certificate of title thereto. Plaintiff used the car approximately three months, and, not being able to secure a certificate of title, returned the car to defendant and sued to recover what he had paid. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. The sale was void. Act No. 46, Pub. Acts 1921, as amended by Act No. 16, Pub. Acts 1923. Plaintiff was entitled to a judgment for the amount of money he had paid, *Page 579 plus the interest, it having been paid without consideration.Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co., 243 Mich. 5.

Judgment reversed, and judgment will be entered for plaintiff, with costs.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant sold plaintiff an automobile on time without delivering to him a certificate of title thereto. Plaintiff used the car approximately three months, and, not being able to secure a certificate of title, returned the car to defendant and sued to recover what he had paid. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. The sale was void. Act No. 46, Pub. Acts 1921, as amended by Act No. 16, Pub. Acts 1923. Plaintiff was entitled to a judgment for the amount of money he had paid, *Page 579 plus the interest, it having been paid without consideration.Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co., 243 Mich. 5.

Judgment reversed, and judgment will be entered for plaintiff, with costs.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 N.W. 1, 246 Mich. 578, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bos-v-holleman-de-weerd-auto-co-mich-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack