Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co.

225 N.W. 1, 246 Mich. 578, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 936
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 17, 1929·No. Docket No. 12, Calendar No. 34,056.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Defendant sold plaintiff an automobile on time without delivering to him a certificate of title thereto. Plaintiff used the car approximately three months, and, not being able to secure a certificate of title, returned the car to defendant and sued to recover what he had paid. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. The sale was void. Act No. 46, Pub. Acts 1921, as amended by Act No. 16, Pub. Acts 1923. Plaintiff was entitled to a judgment for the amount of money he had paid, *Page 579 plus the interest, it having been paid without consideration.Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co., 243 Mich. 5.

Judgment reversed, and judgment will be entered for plaintiff, with costs.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co., 225 N.W. 1, 246 Mich. 578, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 936 (Mich. 1929).

225 N.W. 1 (Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terpstra v. Grand Mobile Trailer Sales
90 N.W.2d 504 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1958)
Bayer v. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co.
55 N.W.2d 746 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1952)
Fullwood v. Catsman
44 N.W.2d 898 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1950)
Taylor v. Burdick
30 N.W.2d 418 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1948)
Jensen v. Wroth
252 N.W. 322 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1934)
Kimber v. Eding
247 N.W. 777 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Kruse v. Carey
242 N.W. 873 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)