Borup v. National Airlines, Inc

159 F. Supp. 807, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2224
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 159 F. Supp. 807 (Borup v. National Airlines, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borup v. National Airlines, Inc, 159 F. Supp. 807, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2224 (S.D.N.Y. 1956).

Opinion

DAWSON, District Judge.

This case came on for pre-trial discussion before me on December 17, 1955. At that time, an offer of settlement for the sum of $15,000 was made and accepted by counsel. On January 18, 1956, Theodore E. Wolcott, Esq., attorney for the plaintiffs, telephoned and stated that his out-of-town counsel and client had refused to agree to the settlement. I advised Mr. Wolcott by letter dated January 19, 1956 that if he wished the case to be returned to the Trial Calendar, it would be necessary to file a formal application which should be supported by an affidavit of the out-of-town counsel and the client. I heard nothing further about the matter until the attached application was made dated February 21, 1956. In the interval, all other remaining cases growing out of the crash of the National Airlines plane on February 11, 1952 were pre-tried, a formal pre-trial order entered, and an order entered consolidating those cases for trial. Those cases now consolidated for trial are on the Trial Calendar of this Court.

The attached application shows that both the attorney for the plaintiffs and their New Jersey counsel recommended acceptance of the $15,000 settlement, but that the plaintiffs have refused to accept it. If plaintiffs are not willing to accept the settlement they, of course, have the right to have the case tried, but they have no right to unreasonably delay, as they have done in this case, and then expect to be joined in the consolidated action or to delay the causes of other plaintiffs whose counsel have participated in the pre-trial hearings and who have moved their ease along to the point where it is now ready for trial.

The application to restore this cause to the Trial Calendar is granted. The cause shall be restored to the foot of the Trial Calendar for the October, 1956 term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vives Vázquez v. Estado Libre Asociado
142 P.R. Dec. 117 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1996)
Transeastern Shipping Corp. v. India Supply Mission
53 F.R.D. 204 (S.D. New York, 1971)
Borup v. National Airlines, Inc.
159 F. Supp. 808 (S.D. New York, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 F. Supp. 807, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borup-v-national-airlines-inc-nysd-1956.