Borough of New Brighton v. Peirsol

107 Pa. 280, 1884 Pa. LEXIS 289
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 9, 1884·No. No. 28·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was filed October 20th, 1884.

Per, Curiam.

If a grade of the street had been legally established and the work actually commenced on the ground, before the purchase by the defendant in error, the damages should not be so split and divided as to give him a portion thereof. lie would take the property cum onere. In this case some work had been done towards changing the natural grade of the ground, but it does not appear that any specific grade had been fixed by any ordinance or resolution of the municipality. What had thus been done, created no legal presumption that any further change of grade would be made. The former owner could not recover for these damages not then contemplated. The claim now is for change of grade made since the defendant in error purchased, and for damages sustained by work done since the adoption of the Constitution of 1874.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borough of New Brighton v. Peirsol, 107 Pa. 280, 1884 Pa. LEXIS 289 (Pa. 1884).

107 Pa. 280 (Borough of New Brighton v. Peirsol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. Allegheny County
169 A.2d 874 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Fayetteville v. Stone
148 S.W. 524 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Marcoz v. Wilmerding Borough
37 Pa. Super. 185 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Klenke v. West Homestead Borough
65 A. 1079 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Harp v. Glenolden Borough
28 Pa. Super. 116 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Rothwell v. California Borough
21 Pa. Super. 234 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
O'Brien v. Phila.
24 A. 1047 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)
Jones v. Borough of Bangor
23 A. 252 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1892)