Borland v. Bayonne Hospital
This text of 344 A.2d 331 (Borland v. Bayonne Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JOHN BORLAND, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BAYONNE HOSPITAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges MATTHEWS, FRITZ and BOTTER.
Mr. Harold Krieger argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Krieger & Chodash, attorneys; Mr. Frank L. Brunetti, on the brief).
Mr. Bruce D. Shoulson argued the cause on behalf of all respondent hospitals (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, attorneys for respondent Beth Israel Medical Center; Mr. Michael L. Rodburg, on the brief).
Mr. Omer F. Brown, II, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Commissioners of Insurance and Health (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Fink in his opinion reported at 122 N.J. Super. 387 (Ch. Div. 1973). See also 135 N.J. Super. 200.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
344 A.2d 331, 136 N.J. Super. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borland-v-bayonne-hospital-njsuperctappdiv-1975.