Borgia v. Interboro General Hospital

451 N.E.2d 483, 59 N.Y.2d 802, 464 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3139
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1983·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

While a disabling illness may excuse an attorney’s delay in serving a complaint, in this case the default occurred well after the illness and therefore the default was not excused. Accordingly, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

*804 Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borgia v. Interboro General Hospital, 451 N.E.2d 483, 59 N.Y.2d 802, 464 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3139 (N.Y. 1983).

451 N.E.2d 483 (Borgia v. Interboro General Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Scivoletti
182 N.Y.S.3d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
WillisvKeelerMotorCarCompany
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Willis v. Keeler Motor Car Co.
121 A.D.3d 1373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Dimopoulos v. Caposella
118 A.D.3d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Dayan v. Darche
96 A.D.3d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Cynan Sheetmetal Products, Inc. v. B.R. Fries & Associates, Inc.
83 A.D.3d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Hoffmann v. Salitan
203 A.D.2d 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Anderson v. Doten
187 A.D.2d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Martinisi v. Cornwall Hospital
177 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)